Mauritania vs Togo: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Mauritania
- Togo
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports -330 kt against -425.33 kt in Togo, a difference of 95.33 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Togo ahead.
Mauritania ranks 206th and Togo ranks 207th of 257 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -326.33 kt | 414.33 kt | 740.67 kt | Togo |
| 2000s | -385.73 kt | 414.33 kt | 800.07 kt | Togo |
| 2010s | -259.97 kt | 414.7 kt | 674.67 kt | Togo |
| 2020s | -328.17 kt | -216.33 kt | 111.83 kt | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Mauritania or Togo?
- Mauritania, at -330 kt against -425.33 kt in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Mauritania and Togo?
- 95.33 kt, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Togo rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Mauritania ranks 206th and Togo ranks 207th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf