Mayotte vs Montenegro: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Mayotte
- Montenegro
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 22 kt against 18.57 kt in Montenegro, a difference of 3.43 kt.
That makes Mayotte's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mayotte ahead.
Mayotte ranks 113th and Montenegro ranks 116th of 257 countries.
Mayotte has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 216.33 kt | -6,812 kt | 7,028 kt | Mayotte |
| 2010s | 48.77 kt | -651.41 kt | 700.18 kt | Mayotte |
| 2020s | 22 kt | 18.57 kt | 3.43 kt | Mayotte |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Mayotte or Montenegro?
- Mayotte, at 22 kt against 18.57 kt in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Mayotte and Montenegro?
- 3.43 kt, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mayotte and Montenegro rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Mayotte ranks 113th and Montenegro ranks 116th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf