Philippines vs Serbia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports -25,261 kt against -26,943 kt in Philippines, a difference of 1,682 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 211th and Serbia ranks 209th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -12,412 kt | -24,762 kt | 12,350 kt | Philippines |
| 2010s | -19,870 kt | -24,548 kt | 4,678 kt | Philippines |
| 2020s | -25,381 kt | -24,819 kt | 561.73 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Philippines or Serbia?
- Serbia, at -25,261 kt against -26,943 kt in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Philippines and Serbia?
- 1,682 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Philippines ranks 211th and Serbia ranks 209th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf