Belgium-Luxembourg vs Nicaragua: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 10,059 kt against 9,244 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 815 kt.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 61st and Nicaragua ranks 59th of 221 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Belgium-Luxembourg or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 10,059 kt against 9,244 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Belgium-Luxembourg and Nicaragua?
- 815 kt, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Nicaragua rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 61st and Nicaragua ranks 59th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf