Belgium vs Cuba: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 6,977 kt against 6,373 kt in Belgium, a difference of 604 kt.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 94th and Cuba ranks 91st of 256 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,617 kt | 8,797 kt | 1,179 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 6,954 kt | 8,824 kt | 1,870 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 6,578 kt | 7,350 kt | 771.78 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Belgium or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 6,977 kt against 6,373 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Belgium and Cuba?
- 604 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cuba?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Cuba rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Belgium ranks 94th and Cuba ranks 91st of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf