Belgium vs Ghana: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 6,635 kt against 6,373 kt in Belgium, a difference of 262 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 94th and Ghana ranks 92nd of 256 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,617 kt | 4,764 kt | 2,854 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 6,954 kt | 5,585 kt | 1,369 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 6,578 kt | 6,749 kt | 170.62 kt | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Belgium or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 6,635 kt against 6,373 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Belgium and Ghana?
- 262 kt, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Ghana?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Ghana rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Belgium ranks 94th and Ghana ranks 92nd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf