Canada vs Sudan: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Canada
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 52,739 kt against 36,410 kt in Canada, a difference of 16,329 kt.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Canada's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 27th of 256 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28,207 kt | 52,445 kt | 24,238 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 29,931 kt | 52,754 kt | 22,823 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Canada or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 52,739 kt against 36,410 kt in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Canada and Sudan?
- 16,329 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Sudan rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Canada ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 27th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf