Egypt vs Laos: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Egypt
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 12,197 kt against 12,162 kt in Egypt, a difference of 35 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 72nd and Laos ranks 70th of 256 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,559 kt | 7,095 kt | 7,463 kt | Egypt |
| 2000s | 18,229 kt | 7,542 kt | 10,687 kt | Egypt |
| 2010s | 16,627 kt | 8,851 kt | 7,777 kt | Egypt |
| 2020s | 11,079 kt | 10,251 kt | 828.19 kt | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Egypt or Laos?
- Laos, at 12,197 kt against 12,162 kt in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Egypt and Laos?
- 35 kt, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Laos?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Laos rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Egypt ranks 72nd and Laos ranks 70th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf