France vs Sudan: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- France
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 52,739 kt against 41,771 kt in France, a difference of 10,968 kt.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.3 times France's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
France ranks 28th and Sudan ranks 27th of 256 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 47,428 kt | 52,445 kt | 5,017 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 43,179 kt | 52,754 kt | 9,575 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, France or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 52,739 kt against 41,771 kt in France as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between France and Sudan?
- 10,968 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do France and Sudan rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- France ranks 28th and Sudan ranks 27th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf