Peru vs Uganda: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Peru
- Uganda
How they compare
Peru currently reports 20,425 kt against 19,902 kt in Uganda, a difference of 523 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 52nd and Uganda ranks 53rd of 256 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,921 kt | 7,797 kt | 7,124 kt | Peru |
| 2000s | 18,310 kt | 10,634 kt | 7,675 kt | Peru |
| 2010s | 19,754 kt | 17,620 kt | 2,134 kt | Peru |
| 2020s | 20,281 kt | 19,908 kt | 372.65 kt | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Peru or Uganda?
- Peru, at 20,425 kt against 19,902 kt in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Peru and Uganda?
- 523 kt, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uganda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Uganda rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Peru ranks 52nd and Uganda ranks 53rd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf