Sudan vs Viet Nam: AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Sudan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 53,615 kt against 52,739 kt in Sudan, a difference of 876 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Sudan ranks 27th and Viet Nam ranks 25th of 256 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52,445 kt | 56,128 kt | 3,683 kt | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 52,754 kt | 53,638 kt | 883.9 kt | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Sudan or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 53,615 kt against 52,739 kt in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Sudan and Viet Nam?
- 876 kt, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Viet Nam?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Viet Nam rank globally for afolu — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Sudan ranks 27th and Viet Nam ranks 25th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf