Africa vs Pakistan: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Africa
- Pakistan
How they compare
Africa currently reports 1,644 kt against 228.82 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 1,415 kt.
That makes Africa's figure about 7.2 times Pakistan's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Africa has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 7th and Pakistan ranks 9th of 33 groups.
Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,077 kt | 100.25 kt | 976.85 kt | Africa |
| 2000s | 1,302 kt | 136.13 kt | 1,166 kt | Africa |
| 2010s | 1,556 kt | 178.48 kt | 1,377 kt | Africa |
| 2020s | 1,657 kt | 217.91 kt | 1,439 kt | Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Africa or Pakistan?
- Africa, at 1,644 kt against 228.82 kt in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Africa and Pakistan?
- 1,415 kt, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Pakistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Pakistan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Africa ranks 7th and Pakistan ranks 9th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf