Austria vs Tajikistan: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 8.28 kt against 7.9 kt in Austria, a difference of 0.38 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 100th and Tajikistan ranks 99th of 222 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.93 kt | 3.78 kt | 6.15 kt | Austria |
| 2000s | 8.88 kt | 3.63 kt | 5.25 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 8.69 kt | 5.93 kt | 2.76 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 8.19 kt | 8.03 kt | 0.1638 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Austria or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 8.28 kt against 7.9 kt in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Austria and Tajikistan?
- 0.38 kt, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Tajikistan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Austria ranks 100th and Tajikistan ranks 99th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf