Belgium vs Tajikistan: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belgium
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 9.57 kt against 8.28 kt in Tajikistan, a difference of 1.29 kt.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 115th and Tajikistan ranks 118th of 257 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.86 kt | 3.63 kt | 7.23 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 11.31 kt | 5.93 kt | 5.38 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 10.31 kt | 8.03 kt | 2.28 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Belgium or Tajikistan?
- Belgium, at 9.57 kt against 8.28 kt in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Belgium and Tajikistan?
- 1.29 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Tajikistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Tajikistan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 115th and Tajikistan ranks 118th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf