Bhutan vs Montenegro: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Bhutan
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.3227 kt against 0.3093 kt in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0134 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Bhutan ranks 185th and Montenegro ranks 182nd of 257 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3532 kt | 0.4483 kt | 0.0951 kt | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.3615 kt | 0.3965 kt | 0.035 kt | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.3164 kt | 0.3382 kt | 0.0217 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Bhutan or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.3227 kt against 0.3093 kt in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Bhutan and Montenegro?
- 0.0134 kt, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Montenegro rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Bhutan ranks 185th and Montenegro ranks 182nd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf