Botswana vs Romania: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Botswana
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 24.72 kt against 24.46 kt in Botswana, a difference of 0.26 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Botswana ranks 67th and Romania ranks 66th of 257 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.4 kt | 27.91 kt | 12.51 kt | Romania |
| 2000s | 12.91 kt | 22.01 kt | 9.09 kt | Romania |
| 2010s | 13.96 kt | 23.9 kt | 9.94 kt | Romania |
| 2020s | 19.09 kt | 25.41 kt | 6.32 kt | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Botswana or Romania?
- Romania, at 24.72 kt against 24.46 kt in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Botswana and Romania?
- 0.26 kt, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Romania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Romania rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 67th and Romania ranks 66th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf