Caribbean vs Japan: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Caribbean
- Japan
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 26.4 kt against 25.42 kt in Japan, a difference of 0.98 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Caribbean ranks 64th and Japan ranks 65th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.79 kt | 32.68 kt | 5.89 kt | Japan |
| 2000s | 25.49 kt | 29.1 kt | 3.61 kt | Japan |
| 2010s | 27.56 kt | 26.22 kt | 1.34 kt | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 26.94 kt | 25.67 kt | 1.27 kt | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Caribbean or Japan?
- Caribbean, at 26.4 kt against 25.42 kt in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Caribbean and Japan?
- 0.98 kt, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Japan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Japan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Caribbean ranks 64th and Japan ranks 65th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf