Chile vs Ghana: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Chile
- Ghana
How they compare
Chile currently reports 18.65 kt against 17.68 kt in Ghana, a difference of 0.97 kt.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 82nd and Ghana ranks 85th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.57 kt | 11.53 kt | 4.04 kt | Chile |
| 2000s | 17.67 kt | 12.57 kt | 5.1 kt | Chile |
| 2010s | 17.71 kt | 15.22 kt | 2.49 kt | Chile |
| 2020s | 16.98 kt | 18.22 kt | 1.24 kt | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Chile or Ghana?
- Chile, at 18.65 kt against 17.68 kt in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Chile and Ghana?
- 0.97 kt, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ghana?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Ghana rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Chile ranks 82nd and Ghana ranks 85th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf