Congo vs Estonia: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Congo
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 5.41 kt against 5.08 kt in Congo, a difference of 0.33 kt.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Congo ranks 134th and Estonia ranks 132nd of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.45 kt | 4.85 kt | 1.41 kt | Estonia |
| 2000s | 4.36 kt | 4.91 kt | 0.543 kt | Estonia |
| 2010s | 5.88 kt | 5.36 kt | 0.5164 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 5.48 kt | 5.55 kt | 0.0708 kt | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Congo or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 5.41 kt against 5.08 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Congo and Estonia?
- 0.33 kt, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Congo ranks 134th and Estonia ranks 132nd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf