Costa Rica vs Togo: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Costa Rica
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 6.41 kt against 6.26 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.15 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 106th and Togo ranks 104th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.1 kt | 3.1 kt | 2 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 4.13 kt | 3.64 kt | 0.4864 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 5.06 kt | 4.85 kt | 0.2061 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 5.74 kt | 6.17 kt | 0.4272 kt | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Costa Rica or Togo?
- Togo, at 6.41 kt against 6.26 kt in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Costa Rica and Togo?
- 0.15 kt, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Togo rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Costa Rica ranks 106th and Togo ranks 104th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf