Egypt vs New Zealand: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Egypt
- New Zealand
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 45.65 kt against 43.98 kt in New Zealand, a difference of 1.67 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.
Egypt ranks 39th and New Zealand ranks 41st of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.22 kt | 47.8 kt | 10.59 kt | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 49.01 kt | 48.95 kt | 0.0579 kt | Egypt |
| 2010s | 49.64 kt | 48.48 kt | 1.16 kt | Egypt |
| 2020s | 45.98 kt | 46.42 kt | 0.4466 kt | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Egypt or New Zealand?
- Egypt, at 45.65 kt against 43.98 kt in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Egypt and New Zealand?
- 1.67 kt, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and New Zealand?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and New Zealand rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Egypt ranks 39th and New Zealand ranks 41st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf