Ethiopia vs Russia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Ethiopia
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 185.4 kt against 175.27 kt in Ethiopia, a difference of 10.13 kt.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 13th and Russia ranks 11th of 257 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73.38 kt | 198.81 kt | 125.43 kt | Russia |
| 2000s | 95.65 kt | 159.57 kt | 63.92 kt | Russia |
| 2010s | 138.05 kt | 167.75 kt | 29.7 kt | Russia |
| 2020s | 168.83 kt | 185.18 kt | 16.35 kt | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Ethiopia or Russia?
- Russia, at 185.4 kt against 175.27 kt in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Ethiopia and Russia?
- 10.13 kt, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Russia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Russia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Ethiopia ranks 13th and Russia ranks 11th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf