Ghana vs Zimbabwe: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Ghana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 17.68 kt against 17.17 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.51 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Ghana ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.53 kt | 16.89 kt | 5.36 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 12.57 kt | 16.99 kt | 4.42 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 15.22 kt | 16.79 kt | 1.57 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 18.22 kt | 16.49 kt | 1.73 kt | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Ghana or Zimbabwe?
- Ghana, at 17.68 kt against 17.17 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 0.51 kt, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Zimbabwe rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Ghana ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf