Italy vs Uganda: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Italy
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 41.05 kt against 34.19 kt in Italy, a difference of 6.86 kt.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 57th and Uganda ranks 54th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.81 kt | 17.39 kt | 31.41 kt | Italy |
| 2000s | 43.01 kt | 23.02 kt | 19.99 kt | Italy |
| 2010s | 37.3 kt | 36.23 kt | 1.07 kt | Italy |
| 2020s | 35.24 kt | 41.1 kt | 5.85 kt | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Italy or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 41.05 kt against 34.19 kt in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Italy and Uganda?
- 6.86 kt, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Uganda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Uganda rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Italy ranks 57th and Uganda ranks 54th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf