Kenya vs Poland: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Kenya
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 68.01 kt against 64.5 kt in Kenya, a difference of 3.51 kt.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Kenya ranks 29th and Poland ranks 28th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.2 kt | 65.51 kt | 34.3 kt | Poland |
| 2000s | 37.87 kt | 63.51 kt | 25.64 kt | Poland |
| 2010s | 54.05 kt | 64.9 kt | 10.85 kt | Poland |
| 2020s | 65.53 kt | 64.79 kt | 0.7451 kt | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Kenya or Poland?
- Poland, at 68.01 kt against 64.5 kt in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Kenya and Poland?
- 3.51 kt, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Poland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Poland rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Kenya ranks 29th and Poland ranks 28th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf