Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1,039 kt
in 2023
Russian Federation
185.4 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
Russian Federation rank
11th

AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Russian Federation
2004006008001.0k199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1,039 kt against 185.4 kt in Russian Federation, a difference of 853.6 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.6 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 33 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 523.62 kt 208.56 kt 315.06 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 632.05 kt 159.57 kt 472.48 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 887.64 kt 167.75 kt 719.9 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1,021 kt 185.18 kt 835.77 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Russian Federation?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1,039 kt against 185.4 kt in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation?
853.6 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for afolu — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: AFOLU — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation-2/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: AFOLU — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf