Laos vs Madagascar: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Laos
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 22.63 kt against 21.76 kt in Laos, a difference of 0.87 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 73rd and Madagascar ranks 70th of 257 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.48 kt | 25.97 kt | 17.49 kt | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 10.42 kt | 24.57 kt | 14.15 kt | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 12.27 kt | 26.57 kt | 14.31 kt | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 15.53 kt | 22.18 kt | 6.65 kt | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Laos or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 22.63 kt against 21.76 kt in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Laos and Madagascar?
- 0.87 kt, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Madagascar?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Madagascar rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Laos ranks 73rd and Madagascar ranks 70th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf