Laos vs Somalia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Laos
- Somalia
How they compare
Laos currently reports 21.76 kt against 20.66 kt in Somalia, a difference of 1.1 kt.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.1 times Somalia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Somalia ahead.
Laos ranks 73rd and Somalia ranks 76th of 257 countries.
Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.48 kt | 20.95 kt | 12.48 kt | Somalia |
| 2000s | 10.42 kt | 22.57 kt | 12.15 kt | Somalia |
| 2010s | 12.27 kt | 21.33 kt | 9.06 kt | Somalia |
| 2020s | 15.53 kt | 20.93 kt | 5.4 kt | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Laos or Somalia?
- Laos, at 21.76 kt against 20.66 kt in Somalia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Laos and Somalia?
- 1.1 kt, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Somalia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Somalia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Laos ranks 73rd and Somalia ranks 76th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf