Latvia vs Tunisia: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Latvia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 7.56 kt against 7.01 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0.55 kt.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 121st and Tunisia ranks 120th of 257 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.04 kt | 6.32 kt | 0.2772 kt | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 5.84 kt | 7.49 kt | 1.65 kt | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 6.84 kt | 8.08 kt | 1.24 kt | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 7.19 kt | 8.23 kt | 1.04 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Latvia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 7.56 kt against 7.01 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Latvia and Tunisia?
- 0.55 kt, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 121st and Tunisia ranks 120th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf