Libya vs Panama: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Libya
- Panama
How they compare
Libya currently reports 4.45 kt against 4.18 kt in Panama, a difference of 0.27 kt.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 117th and Panama ranks 119th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.27 kt | 3.31 kt | 0.0393 kt | Panama |
| 2000s | 3.69 kt | 3.52 kt | 0.1639 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 4.47 kt | 3.74 kt | 0.7244 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 4.38 kt | 3.99 kt | 0.3891 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Libya or Panama?
- Libya, at 4.45 kt against 4.18 kt in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Libya and Panama?
- 0.27 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Panama?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Panama rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Libya ranks 117th and Panama ranks 119th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf