Mali vs Mongolia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Mali
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 51.92 kt against 49.21 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 2.71 kt.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mali ranks 34th and Mongolia ranks 38th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.17 kt | 31.76 kt | 7.59 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 29.47 kt | 32.36 kt | 2.89 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 39.89 kt | 40.68 kt | 0.7873 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 49.85 kt | 48.43 kt | 1.41 kt | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Mali or Mongolia?
- Mali, at 51.92 kt against 49.21 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Mali and Mongolia?
- 2.71 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Mongolia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Mali ranks 34th and Mongolia ranks 38th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf