Malta vs Tonga: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Malta
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 0.0678 kt against 0.0612 kt in Malta, a difference of 0.0066 kt.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 169th and Tonga ranks 167th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1087 kt | 0.059 kt | 0.0497 kt | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.1028 kt | 0.0626 kt | 0.0402 kt | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.0783 kt | 0.0656 kt | 0.0127 kt | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.0642 kt | 0.0678 kt | 0.0036 kt | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Malta or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 0.0678 kt against 0.0612 kt in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Malta and Tonga?
- 0.0066 kt, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tonga?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Tonga rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Malta ranks 169th and Tonga ranks 167th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf