Melanesia vs Togo: AFOLU — Emissions (N2O)
AFOLU — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Melanesia
- Togo
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 6.97 kt against 6.41 kt in Togo, a difference of 0.56 kt.
That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Melanesia has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 122nd and Togo ranks 124th of 257 countries.
Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.04 kt | 3.1 kt | 4.94 kt | Melanesia |
| 2000s | 7.26 kt | 3.64 kt | 3.61 kt | Melanesia |
| 2010s | 7.01 kt | 4.85 kt | 2.16 kt | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 6.69 kt | 6.17 kt | 0.5221 kt | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Melanesia or Togo?
- Melanesia, at 6.97 kt against 6.41 kt in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Melanesia and Togo?
- 0.56 kt, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Togo rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Melanesia ranks 122nd and Togo ranks 124th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf