Georgia vs Israel: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Georgia
- Israel
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 3.55 kt against 3.5 kt in Israel, a difference of 0.05 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 59th and Israel ranks 60th of 78 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.16 kt | 3.82 kt | 0.3382 kt | Georgia |
| 2010s | 3.17 kt | 3.28 kt | 0.1054 kt | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Georgia or Israel?
- Georgia, at 3.55 kt against 3.5 kt in Israel as of 2013.
- What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Georgia and Israel?
- 0.05 kt, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Israel?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Georgia and Israel rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Georgia ranks 59th and Israel ranks 60th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf