Georgia vs Moldova: Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Georgia
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 3.66 kt against 3.55 kt in Georgia, a difference of 0.11 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 59th and Moldova ranks 56th of 78 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.25 kt | 2.79 kt | 1.46 kt | Georgia |
| 2010s | 3.17 kt | 2.98 kt | 0.1912 kt | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Georgia or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 3.66 kt against 3.55 kt in Georgia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Georgia and Moldova?
- 0.11 kt, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Moldova?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Georgia and Moldova rank globally for agricultural soils — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Georgia ranks 59th and Moldova ranks 56th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf