Belarus vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Belarus
-0.503 % change on previous year
in 2023
Cuba
-0.8083 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belarus rank
144th
Cuba rank
147th

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Belarus
  • Cuba
-10-5051015196219922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -0.503 % change on previous year against -0.8083 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 0.3053 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 144th and Cuba ranks 147th of 228 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Cuba Difference Ahead
1990s -4.73 % change on previous year -1.97 % change on previous year 2.76 % change on previous year Cuba
2000s -0.3973 % change on previous year 0.11 % change on previous year 0.5073 % change on previous year Cuba
2010s 0.4312 % change on previous year 0.0714 % change on previous year 0.3598 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s -0.2355 % change on previous year -3.42 % change on previous year 3.18 % change on previous year Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Belarus or Cuba?
Belarus, at -0.503 % change on previous year against -0.8083 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Belarus and Cuba?
0.3053 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cuba?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Cuba rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Belarus ranks 144th and Cuba ranks 147th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/belarus/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/belarus/cuba/">Belarus vs Cuba: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
261 places, 14,689 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.