Belarus vs El Salvador: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Belarus
-0.503 % change on previous year
in 2023
El Salvador
-0.7647 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belarus rank
144th
El Salvador rank
146th

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Belarus
  • El Salvador
-20-10010196219922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -0.503 % change on previous year against -0.7647 % change on previous year in El Salvador, a difference of 0.2617 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was El Salvador ahead.

Belarus ranks 144th and El Salvador ranks 146th of 228 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s -4.73 % change on previous year -0.8532 % change on previous year 3.88 % change on previous year El Salvador
2000s -0.3973 % change on previous year 1.84 % change on previous year 2.23 % change on previous year El Salvador
2010s 0.4312 % change on previous year -3.51 % change on previous year 3.94 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s -0.2355 % change on previous year 1.29 % change on previous year 1.53 % change on previous year El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Belarus or El Salvador?
Belarus, at -0.503 % change on previous year against -0.7647 % change on previous year in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Belarus and El Salvador?
0.2617 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Belarus ranks 144th and El Salvador ranks 146th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs El Salvador: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/belarus/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/belarus/el-salvador/">Belarus vs El Salvador: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
261 places, 14,689 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.