Brazil vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Brazil
3.07 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
3.17 % change on previous year
in 2023
Brazil rank
43rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
41st

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Brazil
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-1001020196219922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 3.17 % change on previous year against 3.07 % change on previous year in Brazil, a difference of 0.1 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Brazil ranks 43rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 41st of 228 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 3.15 % change on previous year -2.74 % change on previous year 5.89 % change on previous year Brazil
1970s 3.72 % change on previous year 1 % change on previous year 2.72 % change on previous year Brazil
1980s 2.62 % change on previous year 2.47 % change on previous year 0.1514 % change on previous year Brazil
1990s 0.9146 % change on previous year 2.37 % change on previous year 1.45 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 2.36 % change on previous year 4.91 % change on previous year 2.55 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.8611 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year 1.61 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 2.84 % change on previous year 1.61 % change on previous year 1.23 % change on previous year Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Brazil or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 3.17 % change on previous year against 3.07 % change on previous year in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.1 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Brazil ranks 43rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 41st of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/brazil/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/brazil/sao-tome-and-principe/">Brazil vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
261 places, 14,689 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.