China, Macao SAR vs Tuvalu: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions

China, Macao SAR
0.002 kt
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.0008 kt
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
190th
Tuvalu rank
192nd

Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Tuvalu
0.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 0.002 kt against 0.0008 kt in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0012 kt.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 2.5 times Tuvalu's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Macao SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Macao SAR ranks 190th and Tuvalu ranks 192nd of 196 countries.

China, Macao SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0004 kt China, Macao SAR
1970s 0.001 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0007 kt China, Macao SAR
1980s 0.0012 kt 0.0004 kt 0.0009 kt China, Macao SAR
1990s 0.0013 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0007 kt China, Macao SAR
2000s 0.0018 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0011 kt China, Macao SAR
2010s 0.0019 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0012 kt China, Macao SAR
2020s 0.002 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0013 kt China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural soils — indirect emissions, China, Macao SAR or Tuvalu?
China, Macao SAR, at 0.002 kt against 0.0008 kt in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural soils — indirect emissions between China, Macao SAR and Tuvalu?
0.0012 kt, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Tuvalu rank globally for agricultural soils — indirect emissions?
China, Macao SAR ranks 190th and Tuvalu ranks 192nd of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Tuvalu: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-soils-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/tuvalu/">China, Macao SAR vs Tuvalu: Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural Soils — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf