Angola vs Poland: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Angola
- Poland
How they compare
Angola currently reports 996.76 kt against 995.27 kt in Poland, a difference of 1.49 kt.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Angola ranks 49th and Poland ranks 50th of 257 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,038 kt | 1,013 kt | 25.18 kt | Angola |
| 2000s | 1,036 kt | 969.36 kt | 66.7 kt | Angola |
| 2010s | 1,112 kt | 972.31 kt | 139.4 kt | Angola |
| 2020s | 1,006 kt | 998.31 kt | 7.5 kt | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Angola or Poland?
- Angola, at 996.76 kt against 995.27 kt in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Angola and Poland?
- 1.49 kt, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Poland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Poland rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Angola ranks 49th and Poland ranks 50th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf