Aruba vs Tonga: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Aruba
- Tonga
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2.54 kt against 2.49 kt in Tonga, a difference of 0.05 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tonga ahead.
Aruba ranks 203rd and Tonga ranks 204th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.28 kt | 2.34 kt | 0.06 kt | Tonga |
| 2000s | 2.47 kt | 2.37 kt | 0.097 kt | Aruba |
| 2010s | 2.52 kt | 2.44 kt | 0.0792 kt | Aruba |
| 2020s | 2.53 kt | 2.49 kt | 0.0439 kt | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Aruba or Tonga?
- Aruba, at 2.54 kt against 2.49 kt in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Aruba and Tonga?
- 0.05 kt, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Tonga?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Tonga rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Aruba ranks 203rd and Tonga ranks 204th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf