Chile vs Laos: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Chile
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 408.04 kt against 398.89 kt in Chile, a difference of 9.15 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 84th and Laos ranks 82nd of 257 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 404.6 kt | 239.49 kt | 165.11 kt | Chile |
| 2000s | 482.85 kt | 262.9 kt | 219.95 kt | Chile |
| 2010s | 432.64 kt | 317.59 kt | 115.06 kt | Chile |
| 2020s | 402.73 kt | 363.28 kt | 39.45 kt | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Chile or Laos?
- Laos, at 408.04 kt against 398.89 kt in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Chile and Laos?
- 9.15 kt, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Laos?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Laos rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Chile ranks 84th and Laos ranks 82nd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf