Japan vs Uruguay: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Japan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Japan currently reports 823.68 kt against 807.65 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 16.03 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 56th and Uruguay ranks 58th of 257 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,006 kt | 776.78 kt | 229.64 kt | Japan |
| 2000s | 912.14 kt | 832.28 kt | 79.86 kt | Japan |
| 2010s | 857.38 kt | 810.27 kt | 47.11 kt | Japan |
| 2020s | 829.21 kt | 794.84 kt | 34.37 kt | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Japan or Uruguay?
- Japan, at 823.68 kt against 807.65 kt in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Japan and Uruguay?
- 16.03 kt, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Uruguay?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Uruguay rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Japan ranks 56th and Uruguay ranks 58th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf