Libya vs Togo: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Libya
- Togo
How they compare
Libya currently reports 113.95 kt against 109.86 kt in Togo, a difference of 4.09 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 132nd and Togo ranks 135th of 257 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 80.42 kt | 69.94 kt | 10.49 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 90.79 kt | 78.84 kt | 11.95 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 109.32 kt | 93.3 kt | 16.02 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 112.72 kt | 109.24 kt | 3.49 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Libya or Togo?
- Libya, at 113.95 kt against 109.86 kt in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Libya and Togo?
- 4.09 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Togo rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Libya ranks 132nd and Togo ranks 135th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf