Serbia vs Tunisia: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Serbia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 178.54 kt against 175.04 kt in Serbia, a difference of 3.5 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 121st and Tunisia ranks 119th of 257 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 220.84 kt | 187.8 kt | 33.04 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 201.65 kt | 182.59 kt | 19.06 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 187.88 kt | 179.06 kt | 8.82 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Serbia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 178.54 kt against 175.04 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Serbia and Tunisia?
- 3.5 kt, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tunisia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Tunisia rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Serbia ranks 121st and Tunisia ranks 119th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf