Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Agrifood systems — Emissions

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
50.8 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
85.42 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
9th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
6th

Agrifood systems — Emissions over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
20406080100199020062023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 85.42 kt against 50.8 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 34.62 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.7 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 9th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th of 22 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 28.38 kt 77.97 kt 49.59 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 34.28 kt 93.27 kt 58.99 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 38.7 kt 102.5 kt 63.8 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 47.75 kt 92.9 kt 45.16 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 85.42 kt against 50.8 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34.62 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 9th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Agrifood systems — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Agrifood systems — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf