Haiti vs Libya: Agrifood systems — Emissions
Agrifood systems — Emissions over time
- Haiti
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 4.93 kt against 4.78 kt in Haiti, a difference of 0.15 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Haiti ranks 118th and Libya ranks 117th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.67 kt | 3.55 kt | 0.1221 kt | Haiti |
| 2000s | 4.61 kt | 4.04 kt | 0.5625 kt | Haiti |
| 2010s | 4.86 kt | 4.9 kt | 0.0369 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 4.75 kt | 4.86 kt | 0.1021 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Haiti or Libya?
- Libya, at 4.93 kt against 4.78 kt in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Haiti and Libya?
- 0.15 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Libya rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
- Haiti ranks 118th and Libya ranks 117th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf