Belgium-Luxembourg vs Estonia: Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Estonia
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 20.24 kt against 20 kt in Estonia, a difference of 0.24 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 134th and Estonia ranks 136th of 205 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Belgium-Luxembourg or Estonia?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 20.24 kt against 20 kt in Estonia as of 1999.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Belgium-Luxembourg and Estonia?
- 0.24 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Estonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Estonia rank globally for agrifood systems waste disposal — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 134th and Estonia ranks 136th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood Systems Waste Disposal — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf