Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2)

Australia
363,675 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.01 million kt
in 2023
Australia rank
24th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
22nd

All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) over time

  • Australia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.01 million kt against 363,675 kt in Australia, a difference of 642,065 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.8 times Australia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 24th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd of 257 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 345,679 kt 744,401 kt 398,722 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 423,352 kt 749,014 kt 325,661 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 373,823 kt 966,664 kt 592,841 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 363,070 kt 988,760 kt 625,690 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions, Australia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.01 million kt against 363,675 kt in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions between Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
642,065 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions?
Australia ranks 24th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf