Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.01 million kt
in 2023
South Africa
369,183 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
22nd
South Africa rank
23rd

All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.01 million kt against 369,183 kt in South Africa, a difference of 636,557 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.7 times South Africa's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 23rd of 33 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 744,401 kt 393,404 kt 350,997 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 749,014 kt 464,131 kt 284,882 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 966,664 kt 501,357 kt 465,307 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 988,760 kt 406,217 kt 582,544 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.01 million kt against 369,183 kt in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
636,557 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 23rd of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf